Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $39.9 vs $51.6
- Up to 24% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-7100T - $0.13 vs $0.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G3900 - 306 vs 298 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
298
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |