Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1829 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-560 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $39.9 vs $60.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-560 - $0.34 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |