Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-2120T - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $39.9 vs $60.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-2120T - $0.31 vs $0.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |