Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than FX-6300 - 80 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than FX-6300 - $39.9 vs $58.02
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74432 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |