Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 490 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 256 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $63.92 vs $70.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - $0.25 vs $0.28 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |