Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3220 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $39.9 vs $91.98
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
