Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $39.9 vs $94.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.26 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 176 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13218 minutes ago
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |