Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $39.9 vs $100.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-14100F - $0.19 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Fortnite than Celeron G3900 - 241 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
214
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13855 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
45%
Price, $
$100.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |