Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1408 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $39.9 vs $89.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-2700K - $0.34 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13160 minutes ago
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |