Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3516 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $79.0 vs $144.98
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.68 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220 - 143 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for $144.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |