Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $39.9 vs $70.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i3-7100 - $0.23 vs $0.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 16% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3900 - 198 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |