Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 37% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $49.0 vs $78.02
- Up to 22% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $1.11 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Core i3-2100 - 55 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14401 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
78%
Price, $
$78.02
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |