Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-860 is 1084 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $22.92 vs $48.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-860 - $0.43 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 6% better in League of Legends than FX-4130 - 56 vs 53 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7153 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |