Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-560 is 729 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $52.02 vs $60.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-560 - $0.35 vs $0.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4130 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 73 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |