Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 733 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $42.85 vs $52.87
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-4460T - $0.3 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6200 - 150 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 790 minutes ago
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |