Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 871 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8120 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $39.99 vs $52.87
- Up to 21% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4460T - $0.34 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 927 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 928 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |