Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770S - 186 vs 172 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $91.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - $0.53 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
88.33333333333334%
Price, $
$112
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4396 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
92.47311827956989%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
49.44567627494457%
Multi-Core
2234
47.051390058972196%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |