Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $53.55 vs $90.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G4900 - 280 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.5361803084223%
Multi-Core
1051
15.412817128611234%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |