Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 48 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $68.02 vs $135.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-8600 - $0.57 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G4900 - 132 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |