Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2023 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700T - 159 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $87.98 vs $99.9
- Up to 14% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.55 vs $0.64 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |