Buy on Amazon
$25.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $25.7 vs $85.0
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3240T - 239 vs 229 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76810 minutes ago
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
37.437185929648244%
Multi-Core
971
41.56678082191781%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
