Buy on Amazon
$25.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $25.7 vs $109.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.23 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240T - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
25%
Price, $
$109.99
23%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
