Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-3240T - 153 vs 152 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $25.7 vs $39.9
- Up to 35% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Celeron G3900 - $0.17 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
152
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
