Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $39.9 vs $60.0
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.57337883959044%
Multi-Core
992
30.73110285006196%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |