Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 and the cheaper Celeron G3900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $39.9 vs $68.02
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-6300 - $0.28 vs $0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 20% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 174 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
83.33333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
71.7948717948718%
Price, $
$68.02
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.038034865293184%
Multi-Core
992
39.070500196927924%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |