Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3026 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2400 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $34.95 vs $107.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - $0.31 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $107 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
112
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |