Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 50 days older than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than FX-4300 - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than FX-4300 - $41.0 vs $48.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing New World than FX-4300 - $0.41 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |