Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 41 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1610 - 67 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-4300 - $37.0 vs $48.02
- Up to 22% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-4300 - $0.56 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |