Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 57 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-4130 - 188 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-4300 - $22.92 vs $48.02
- Up to 54% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than FX-4300 - $0.12 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |