Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4300 is 415 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2120T - 115 vs 114 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $48.02 vs $60.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2120T - $0.42 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |