Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $48.02 vs $59.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 28% better in Dota 2 than FX-4300 - 212 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dota 2 than FX-4300 - $0.28 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |