Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-4300 - $39.99 vs $48.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than FX-4300 - $0.38 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |