Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-4300 - $46.41 vs $48.02
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - $0.28 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |