Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6300 and the cheaper FX-4300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-6300 - $48.02 vs $74.04
- Up to 34% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-6300 - $0.44 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than FX-4300 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18645 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18645 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |