Buy on Amazon
$48.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 313 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $48.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-4930K - $0.21 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4300 - 232 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core Vishera Processor 3.8GHz Socket AM3+ FD4300WMW4MHK OEM Ver. with Thermal Paste Bundle
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4930K Processor - BX80633I74930K
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-4930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
