Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 26% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3900 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $39.9 vs $85.13
- Up to 41% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i3-10105F - $0.34 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
58%
Price, $
$85.13
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13444 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
116
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |