Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2023 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - 564 vs 532 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $85.13 vs $100.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - $0.15 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
564
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12905 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |