Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 11% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G3930T - 102 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $39.0 vs $85.13
- Up to 49% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-10105F - $0.42 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
50%
Price, $
$85.13
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13097 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |