Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 179 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $39.0 vs $41.13
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2886 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |