Buy on Amazon
$41.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 552 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than FX-6200 - 661 vs 594 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-6200 - $41.6 vs $42.85
- Up to 14% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-6200 - $0.06 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
661
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
