Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 91 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1820 - 148 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $41.6 vs $46.41
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dead Space than Celeron G1820 - $0.28 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |