Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 978 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 330 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-4350 - $39.0 vs $51.6
- Up to 25% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-4350 - $0.12 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4350 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3478 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |