Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1610 - 196 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-4350 - $37.0 vs $48.1
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4350 - $0.19 vs $0.25 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |