Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1311 days older than the more expensive Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 45% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-4670 - $1.39 vs $2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i3-7100T - 55 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $60.0 vs $75.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
98.18181818181819%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
80%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
54.509803921568626%
Price, $
$60
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
95.22184300341297%
Multi-Core
2260
70.01239157372986%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |