Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2186 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 21% better in F1 23 than Core i7-2600K - 198 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $69.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-7100T - $0.36 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
94.73684210526315%
Price, $
$75
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
164
82.82828282828282%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |