Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G4900 - 211 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $53.55 vs $75.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i3-7100T - $0.27 vs $0.36 per FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
75.00000000000001%
Price, $
$75
71%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
94.3127962085308%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.19713261648745%
Multi-Core
1051
46.50442477876106%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
