Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 915 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 324 vs 316 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $75.0 vs $81.9
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Buy for $81.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |