Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 427 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-6350 - $42.85 vs $100.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than FX-6350 - $0.24 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6200 - 184 vs 182 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2284 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |