Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6200 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6200 is 589 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $42.85 vs $100.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-760 - $0.24 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11081 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |