Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1383 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-760 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $41.13 vs $100.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-760 - $0.23 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |